It seems that we should provide tar.gz (see Original Message on bottom
for Dennis reasoning). I disagree, but I'm not the one who do the review.
Dennis, can you provide us some tool for building tar.gz from our
revision control? I suggest you to start with "make
git-archive-to-tar-gz" target, which do the tar, but name it with
current revision.
Additionaly - can we have some web space where we can put the tar.gz
files? And if we can have nightly build somewhere too, it would be cool.
Mirek
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse
users and includes common files for NOCpulse.
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:32:01 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109
--- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-17
02:32:00 EDT ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream says
"There
is no public revision control system or publically released tarball for
these
programs so there is no tarball to list" there is a public revision control
system, and im saying there should be public tarballs. this is
something that
could be useful and useable by more than spacewalk. spacewalk could
also end
up in other distros. a traball should be provided.
otherwise it looks good.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug.
--
Miroslav Suchy
RHN Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
