On Friday 17 October 2008 09:15:14 am Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > if this is a git snapshot then you have not named it correctly. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_package > >s you only need to provide tarballs for official releases. which your > > packages look like. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control > > when ive needed to ship straight from source control ive used a script > > and put that in the package. > > It is not git snapshots (those are the .git.sha1). It is normal official > package. But the question is if this version will be in Spacewalk 0.3? I > do not know. And neither I, you or Fedora should care, 'cos fedora take > package independently. > > But I did not want or wanted to discuss this specific bug. I wanted to > discuss tar.gz in general. > > > Note that you need to maintain the spec file in Fedora's cvs once its > > in. you can keep a copy in git but you need to be aware that people > > might make modifications to the spec, at times. > > I know. > > > On that note there is room on fedora hosted for tarballs. but only > > officially released ones should go there. > > What is officially? Every package I made is offically. I usually create > several officially package. > Can you please tell me how can I put it on fedora hosted? I mean on > daily bases.
scp to fedorahosted.org:/srv/web/releases/s/p/spacewalk/ they are available at https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/p/spacewalk/ you should only put tarballs there that have x.x.x releases if its a git snapshot that has the git hash as a release they should not go there. I am going to ask you again. do not put me in the To or CC or BCC of email to mailing lists. Dennis _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
