On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:18:34PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > some time ago, the discussion went if the stable branch was completely > CLA-covered and that we might continue fixing that one on SF.net.
I've started to really like SVN personally... but we probably should keep the non Apache stuff at sf.net. So I'd say that 2.62 should be done from CVS. > What's the resolution with this, ie. if I want to fix something there should > I commit to CVS or SVN? Probably CVS. -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
