-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: >On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote: >> I faintly remember that there was some code in 2.6x which wasn't in HEAD >> anymore and thus Justin didn't send any CLA requests to these people. > >That must have been taken care of (or overlooked) since the 2.6x branch >was in Justin's "CLA ok" repo archive. Back again! hmm -- that's a good point, there's still some stuff in 2.6x contrib and build dirs that aren't CLA'd, maybe we should start stripping it out *there* too. if I recall correctly, the only "mainline" functionality we'll lose is the Horde modifications to customise in detail what the SQL statement is for SpamAssassin SQL prefs; they didn't provide a CLA. Most other stuff is extraneous, like translations, language-specific rules, build tools and contrib stuff. >I've been applying stuff to SVN though, treating CVS as a dead donkey. Agreed here. SVN is *great*. ;) >It also means more testing for SVN and hopefully a faster move to the >real non-test repo. Once that happens, btw, we'll want to update the >docs and webpage and such to point at SVN instead of CVS). Yes. I'm thinking we should probably update everything to point at SVN ASAP, even while we're in the incubator repo. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQE/+RkXQTcbUG5Y7woRAiE7AKDSChNQAJ8Xk1Wj8RakeQWrd05WXQCeJIyj QmsSYtBGFi3cw8AP3difPsM= =/zqv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
