On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:10:15AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote: > I've started to really like SVN personally... but we probably should > keep the non Apache stuff at sf.net. So I'd say that 2.62 should be > done from CVS.
Well, SVN is a copy of the CLA-covered parts of CVS, which was cleaned up pre-move to SVN. There's 100% no reason to use CVS at this point unless you want to work on the non-CLA stuff in the other modules (asfpurgatory, etc.) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Broken guitar for sale - no strings attached.
pgpnl2lZprBa6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
