On Monday 05 January 2004 08:58 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> hmm -- that's a good point, there's still some stuff in 2.6x contrib
> and build dirs that aren't CLA'd, maybe we should start stripping it
> out *there* too.
As we will release 2.62 still under the GPL/PAL (I think?), I don't know if
this is really needed. Actually, all that stuff is still available in the
CVS/SVN repository so if one wants be be really picky we'd had to get CLAs
from everybody who every contributed if we really needed to cover
everything which went to the ASF repositories. (IMHO & IANAL)
> if I recall correctly, the only "mainline" functionality we'll lose
> is the Horde modifications to customise in detail what the SQL
> statement is for SpamAssassin SQL prefs; they didn't provide a
> CLA. Most other stuff is extraneous, like translations,
> language-specific rules, build tools and contrib stuff.
I don't like the idea of removing (or adding) any feature on a bugfix
release.
Cheers,
Malte
--
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
