On Sunday 04 January 2004 18:27 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:10:15AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > I've started to really like SVN personally...
Me too; I already love it :) Especially that you can say 'svn up' without
typing your password.
> > but we probably should
> > keep the non Apache stuff at sf.net. So I'd say that 2.62 should be
> > done from CVS.
>
> Well, SVN is a copy of the CLA-covered parts of CVS, which was cleaned
> up pre-move to SVN.
>
> There's 100% no reason to use CVS at this point unless you want to work
> on the non-CLA stuff in the other modules (asfpurgatory, etc.)
I faintly remember that there was some code in 2.6x which wasn't in HEAD
anymore and thus Justin didn't send any CLA requests to these people.
Cheers,
Malte
--
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
