On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:23:47PM -0700, Jeremy Oddo wrote: > As I've stated before, I've cut down the amount of spam actually getting > to it's intended destination by over 98% by using SA. That's gotta be > hurting the spammers :)
But _does_ it really hurt them. They don't get any feedback - users that install spam filters wouldn't have responded to to the spam anyway, other than deleting it manually. The only difference is that the deletion process is automated by a spam filter. I reckon spammers don't really care about the users that install filters. Spamassassin's great and works like a charm for me, but we need to put the bite on spammers in some other way! Regards: Jim Ford -- Spam poison - don't use! ---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <--- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
