On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:32:48 -0400, you wrote: >At 05:23 PM 4/30/04 -0500, Hoyt Bailey wrote: >> > Could you perhaps be more specific about your problem? being >> > "considered a spammer" isn't a very specific problem >>Brett Miller explained it logically. My major complaint was that dial >>up users are considered as possible spamers if I were sending spam I >>would at least have a direct connection to the net. > >That's untrue.. dialup users are considered potentially spammers IF they >don't relay via their ISP's mailserver.
and what (he asked with a straight face) are we supposed to do if our so-called ISPs don't offer a mail server? My new policy is to send my mail where it needs to go. If it doesn't arrive, I refer the intended recipient to _THEIR_ ISP and tell them that it needs to be fixed. I'm all in favor of blocking spam, but sopme approaches are just plain stupid. Mike- -- If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,
