On Sat, 1 May 2004 16:02:30 +0200, you wrote:

>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Michael W.Cocke"
>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:32:48 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>> >At 05:23 PM 4/30/04 -0500, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
>> >> > Could you perhaps be more specific about your problem? being
>> >> > "considered a spammer" isn't a very specific problem
>> >>Brett Miller explained it logically.  My major complaint was that dial
>> >>up users are considered as possible spamers if I were sending spam I
>> >>would at least have a direct connection to the net.
>> >
>> >That's untrue.. dialup users are considered potentially spammers IF they
>> >don't relay via their ISP's mailserver.
>>
>> and what (he asked with a straight face) are we supposed to do if our
>> so-called ISPs don't offer a mail server?
>
>Can you give an example of an ISP in this situation?

Believe it or not, AT&T business DSL doesn't offer mail services (or
DNS service) unless you spring for the 5 IP address plan - which costs
$50.00 per month more than the single IP plan that I use.  I would
have to use their webmail system if I wanted to use their mail server.
Not going to happen.

>> My new policy is to send my mail where it needs to go.  If it doesn't
>> arrive, I refer the intended recipient to _THEIR_ ISP and tell them
>> that it needs to be fixed.  I'm all in favor of blocking spam, but
>> sopme approaches are just plain stupid.
>
>In reality it isn't as stupid as it appears to you. Dynamic IPs change
>"ownership" every time a new connection is made. There is an issue of
>responsability. If spam arises from a dynamic ip how do you find out
>who sent it? Not all ISPs keep or are interested in looking up
>logs of dynamic ip assignments to progress spam reports. Not
>accepting mail from dynamic ranges is remarkably effective at
>stopping spam amongst other things.

I agree that the dynamic IP issue is sticky - but that's what content
filters are for, IMHO. No one in their right mind is going to pump
5000 emails out on a dialup line. Cable modems...  hmmmm...  I don't
have a good answer.

Mike-

--
If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough.
--
Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide 
spam filters at catherders.com.  If
email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,

Reply via email to