On Sat, 1 May 2004 18:59:48 -0700, you wrote:
>From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> At 06:12 PM 5/1/04 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> >LOL! IP service without DNS. There's a novel "unbundling" concept
>> >that probably no one else considered (since it's such a bad
>> >idea).
>>
>> That's not such a bad thing.. Let's face it.. For my work, the ISP has DNS
>> service, but I don't use it. I've already got two DNS servers on site
>> anyway. On the business network side, you really don't need your ISP to
>> provide you anything but a route. (and preferably reverse DNS
>customization
>> or delegation for the IP(s) routed.)
>
>Do you have reverse lookup setup and configured? Does it report the
>correct thing when using the root name servers? I presume you also
>have an MX record setup. Does it report the correct thing when using
>the root name servers? If not AT&T is screwing you not the BLs.
>
>{^_^}
They don't offer that either. Basically, on the plan I'm on, they hand
me a wire with an IP adress and say "have a nice day".
Mike-
--
If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough.
--
Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide
spam filters at catherders.com. If
email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,
