From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> At 06:12 PM 5/1/04 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> >LOL! IP service without DNS.  There's a novel "unbundling" concept
> >that probably no one else considered (since it's such a bad
> >idea).
>
> That's not such a bad thing.. Let's face it.. For my work, the ISP has DNS
> service, but I don't use it. I've already got two DNS servers on site
> anyway. On the business network side, you really don't need your ISP to
> provide you anything but a route. (and preferably reverse DNS
customization
> or delegation for the IP(s) routed.)

Do you have reverse lookup setup and configured? Does it report the
correct thing when using the root name servers? I presume you also
have an MX record setup. Does it report the correct thing when using
the root name servers? If not AT&T is screwing you not the BLs.

{^_^}

  • ... Michael W . Cocke
    • ... John Fawcett
      • ... Michael W . Cocke
        • ... Bob Proulx
        • ... Jeff Chan
          • ... Matt Kettler
        • ... jdow
        • ... John Fawcett
          • ... Michael W . Cocke
            • ... spamassassin-users-return-7889-apmail-incubator-spamassassin-users-archive=incubator . apache . org
        • ... Kai Schaetzl

Reply via email to