On Tuesday 22 October 2002 06:12 pm, Coles, Patrice M. wrote: > Bellsouth did not have spammers on the part of their subnet that contains > my addresses, so a listing of all of their address space *was* erroneous.
uh - SPEWS lists one address. Then it keeps increasing the space listed until the spammers are terminated. If the spammers arent terminated, then SPEWS could eventually list all of Bell South space without being in error > Ever heard of subnetting? People who run these blacklists may find it > convenient to deny the existence of it, but the rest of the world has > pretty much gotten a grip on the fact that address space does get subnetted > and someone in one part of that space doesn't necessarily have control of > how the other part is used. The space is Bell South's space. They control all of it >Bellsouth may be allowing spamming or not, so you havent bothered to determine whether the spammers are on Bell South AT ALL? That's the first thing to check but > that still does not make it fair for these spam vigilantes to persecute the > many for the sins of the few, or the ISP. it's called a consumer boycott. I wont accept traffic from ISPs who host spammers. Dominos wont deliver to neighborhoods where drug dealers hang on the corner. deal. -- charles oriez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 39 34' 34.4"N / 105 00' 06.3"W ** "You want us to hit delete. A blocking list is basically a diesel delete key. A blocking list is the bulk delete response to unwanted bulk email. When we use a blocking list, we are hitting delete, as you ask us to do. Why do you object?" -- David Canzi _______________________________________________ spamcon-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
