Hi David, Thanks for the tip. I am interested in knowing how does PTMProphet algorithm differs from Ascore. Are they exactly same except implementation. Also, I can locate the PTMProphetParser in my linux build of TPP4.5.0. Can this be used instead of the window binary? It says the usage is PTMProphetParser <OPTIONS> <file1.pep.xml> May I know the options available? I am assuming it takes in PeptideProphet processed pep.xml.
Thanks, LW On Oct 17, 4:29 pm, David Shteynberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi LW, > > Yes I have used ascore with some success, although it is not > integrated with TPP and crashes sometimes on longer peptides. We have > a TPP integrated tool that is faster and as good or better than Ascore > from some initial testing. The tool is available on commandline only > at the moment and is not distributed with the installer yet. It is > called PTMProphet and you can get an initial Windows only version of > the test executable from this > link:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21286225/PTMProphetParser.exe > > Hope that helps, > -David > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:11 PM, LW <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > I am wondering if anyone has use the ascore for > > phospho site localization on XTandem/TPP processed data. > > The software in Gygi lab seems to be based on sequest dta/out output. > > > Thanks, > > LW > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "spctools-discuss" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
