Hi David, Thanks. I tried the version from trunk and still got the segmentation fault. I ran it using: PTMProphetParser STY,80 interact.pep.xml Is this the correct?
I also ran gdb on it: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00000000004d906e in SpectraSTLibImporter::SpectraSTLibImporter(std::vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >&, SpectraSTLib*, SpectraSTCreateParams&) () Could you commit your latest code Thanks, LW On Oct 20, 10:41 am, David Shteynberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi LW, > > The version distributed in the release is perhaps a bit older than the > one in SVN trunk. Have you tried building it from trunk? I know my > version is working on Linux, if you build from trunk and it still > doesn't work please let me know and I will commit my absolute latest > code (that I've been testing without seg faults). > > Thanks, > -David > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:56 AM, LW <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi David, > > > I got a segmentation fault when I tried to run the command-line linux > > build. > > Is there a working linux version? > > > Thanks, > > LW > > > On Oct 19, 10:37 am, LW <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi David, > > >> Thanks for the tip. I am interested in knowing how does PTMProphet > >> algorithm differs from Ascore. > >> Are they exactly same except implementation. > >> Also, I can locate the PTMProphetParser in my linux build of TPP4.5.0. > >> Can this be used instead of the window binary? > >> It says the usage is PTMProphetParser <OPTIONS> <file1.pep.xml> > >> May I know the options available? I am assuming it takes in > >> PeptideProphet > >> processed pep.xml. > > >> Thanks, > >> LW > > >> On Oct 17, 4:29 pm, David Shteynberg > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi LW, > > >> > Yes I have used ascore with some success, although it is not > >> > integrated with TPP and crashes sometimes on longer peptides. We have > >> > a TPP integrated tool that is faster and as good or better than Ascore > >> > from some initial testing. The tool is available on commandline only > >> > at the moment and is not distributed with the installer yet. It is > >> > called PTMProphet and you can get an initial Windows only version of > >> > the test executable from this > >> > link:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21286225/PTMProphetParser.exe > > >> > Hope that helps, > >> > -David > > >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:11 PM, LW <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > I am wondering if anyone has use the ascore for > >> > > phospho site localization on XTandem/TPP processed data. > >> > > The software in Gygi lab seems to be based on sequest dta/out output. > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > LW > > >> > > -- > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > > Groups "spctools-discuss" group. > >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > [email protected]. > >> > > For more options, visit this group > >> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "spctools-discuss" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
