spdx-tech  

Messages by Thread

• • [spdx-tech] SPDX 3 serialization examples armin.taenzer via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Tech Agenda Reminder Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Canonicalisation Committee meeting 2023-03-31 - any agenda topics? Sebastian Crane
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Canonicalisation Committee meeting 2023-03-31 - any agenda topics? David Kemp
• Re: [spdx-tech] [spdx] GitHub blogged they are creating SBOMs in SPDX format Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions Steve Winslow
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions Steve Winslow
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions Karsten Klein
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Reminder: Change Proposal on custom license exceptions / modifiers / additions J Lovejoy
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, March 28, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Serialization: Checksums and readability David Kemp
• [spdx-tech] Not able to install all required libraries of tools-python HarshVardhan Mahawar
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Serialization: Ontologies vs Datatypes David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Serialization: Ontologies vs Datatypes Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Serialization: Ontologies vs Datatypes David Kemp
• [spdx-tech] #spdx Gsoc contribution guidance and suggestion Utkarsh Saxena
  • [spdx-tech] #spdx Gsoc contribution guidance and suggestion Utkarsh Saxena
• [spdx-tech] Handling invalid licenses Anthony Harrison
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Handling invalid licenses Keith Zantow via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Handling invalid licenses Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Handling invalid licenses Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, March 14, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] FW: CISA SBOM update Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] SPDX v2.3 JSON schema diagram Norio Kobota
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX v2.3 JSON schema diagram Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX v2.3 JSON schema diagram Norio Kobota
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX v2.3 JSON schema diagram Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Serialization subteam: Toy Example David Kemp
• [spdx-tech] OpenVEX lively discussion underway on GitHub OpenSSF Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Collaborating with SPDX in GSoC 2023! Banula Kumarage
• [spdx-tech] For participating in GSOC #spdx Prakriti Mandal
• [spdx-tech] scancode-toolkit updated to SPDX 3.20 license list Ayan Mahapatra
  • Re: [spdx-tech] scancode-toolkit updated to SPDX 3.20 license list Sebastian Schuberth
  • Re: [spdx-tech] scancode-toolkit updated to SPDX 3.20 license list Ayan Mahapatra
• [spdx-tech] FYI: Cross pollination with the CISA ICT_SCRM Task Force SW Assurance work stream Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FYI: Cross pollination with the CISA ICT_SCRM Task Force SW Assurance work stream Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] FYI US Federal CIO comment on SBOM Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Build Profile Meeting Cadence Update Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] RelationshipType packages Henk Birkholz
• [spdx-tech] Agent or Identity David Kemp
• [spdx-tech] New Python tools pre-release armin.taenzer via lists.spdx.org
  • [spdx-tech] Released - Re: New Python tools pre-release meret.behrens via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] US National Cybersecurity Strategy is out and it includes SBOM - this is big Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Gradle Plugin donation Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Question on required vs cardinality Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Question on required vs cardinality Keith Zantow via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Question on required vs cardinality Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] IBM has joined the SBOM movement Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Is tools.spdx.org down? Peter Monks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Is tools.spdx.org down? Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Is tools.spdx.org down? Sebastian Crane
• [spdx-tech] CISA Director Easterly's speech at CMU yesterday - very supportive of SBOM Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, February 28, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• Re: [spdx-tech] Announcing SPDX 3.0 Serialisation meetings Sebastian Crane
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Serialisation Focus Group - weekly meeting Sebastian Crane
• [spdx-tech] Conversion of (multiple) SPDX 2 fileTypes into SPDX 3 contentType armin.taenzer via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Conversion of (multiple) SPDX 2 fileTypes into SPDX 3 contentType Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Conversion of (multiple) SPDX 2 fileTypes into SPDX 3 contentType Alexios Zavras
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Conversion of (multiple) SPDX 2 fileTypes into SPDX 3 contentType Anthony Harrison
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Canonicalisation Committee - weekly meeting Sebastian Crane
• [spdx-tech] FileNames in SPDX File item Anthony Harrison
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FileNames in SPDX File item Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FileNames in SPDX File item David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FileNames in SPDX File item Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FileNames in SPDX File item David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FileNames in SPDX File item Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FileNames in SPDX File item Anthony Harrison
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FileNames in SPDX File item Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] IETF SCITT revised use cases document Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] SCITT Use Cases Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Unable to attend today's meeting - my apologies Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Unable to attend today's meeting - my apologies Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Actor and Identity David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Actor and Identity David Kemp
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Side-by-side comparison of VEX and VDR from Steve Springett Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Build profile meeting update Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, January 31, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Python tools release 0.7.0 on PyPI armin.taenzer via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] [Question] Relationship and RelathionshipType for a profile Takashi Ninjouji
• [spdx-tech] Package Supplier clarification Rose Judge via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Package Supplier clarification Alexios Zavras
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Package Supplier clarification Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Package Supplier clarification Rose Judge via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Package Supplier clarification Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Package Supplier clarification sherzberg via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Package Supplier clarification Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] SPDX in GSoC 2023! Alexios Zavras
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX in GSoC 2023! Rahul
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX in GSoC 2023! Adolfo
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX in GSoC 2023! Rahul
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX in GSoC 2023! shreyanshshah29
  • [spdx-tech] SPDX in GSoC 2023! Prakriti Mandal
• [spdx-tech] New release of the SPDX Java Tools Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, January 24, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Build profile development branch on the spdx-3-model repo Nisha Kumar
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Build profile development branch on the spdx-3-model repo Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Question about License Expression Disjunctions Timothy Gillespie
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Question about License Expression Disjunctions Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Identities David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Identities William Bartholomew (CELA) via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Identities Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Identities John Andersen
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Identities David Kemp
  • [spdx-tech] Identities David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Identities Joe Bussell via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Identities Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Identities Vladimir Sitnikov
• [spdx-tech] [ANNOUNCE] License and Security Compliance tools users and developers meeting on Feb. 3rd 2023, one day before FOSDEM in Brussels Philippe Ombredanne
• [spdx-tech] New version of the SPDX Online Tools Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] joint legal and tech call Thursday, Jan 12th - Change Proposal: ExceptionRef J Lovejoy
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, January 10, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] spdx-sbom-generator/opensbom-generator new community meeting time Nisha Kumar
• [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Adolfo
  • Re: [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Keith Zantow via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] clarification around "documentDescribes" field Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, January 3, 2023 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] SPDX License Diff browser extension not producing report Sebastian Crane
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX License Diff browser extension not producing report Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] God #cal-notice hoseintorshani48
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, December 27, 2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, December 27, 2022 #cal-reminder Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] I highly recommend reading Steve Springett's thoughtful analysis of VEX and VDR Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Daggerboard SPDX SBOM Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Next Python tools sync meeting on January 12th armin.taenzer via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, December 20, 2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Tech Call Agenda and schedule Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Modeling actors David Kemp
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, December 13, 2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Please help people understand what a VEX really is, according to the VEX Author, Thomas Schmidt Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] Change proposal, 2023 meeting schedule, etc. J Lovejoy
• [spdx-tech] Tech core team minutes Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] External document namespace before SPDX id? armin.taenzer via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] External document namespace before SPDX id? Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, December 6, 2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] New US Government RFP from the State Department (Evolve project) requiring SBOM's Dick Brooks
• Re: [spdx-tech] [spdx] SPDX creation phase Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [spdx] SPDX creation phase Steve Kilbane
• [spdx-tech] Multiple Licenses in a single LicenseRef? Rose Judge via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [spdx-implementers] Multiple Licenses in a single LicenseRef? Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Multiple Licenses in a single LicenseRef? Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Multiple Licenses in a single LicenseRef? Vargenau, Marc-Etienne (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
• [spdx-tech] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Tony Aiuto via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Eliot Lear
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Eliot Lear
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Adolfo
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] [SCITT] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Eliot Lear
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Another party claiming that SBOM is bad Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] New tools-python release candidate Nicolaus Weidner via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, November 29, 2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Reminder: tools-python meeting 30min later this week Nicolaus Weidner via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] FYI: Anti-SBOM campaign from ITI Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] An example where canonicalization does not behave well with extensions Maximilian Huber via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, November 22, 2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Option of using SPDX ID/URI when converting files (tools-java) #spdx info
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Option of using SPDX ID/URI when converting files (tools-java) #spdx Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Option of using SPDX ID/URI when converting files (tools-java) #spdx Info@ Clear Byte
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Option of using SPDX ID/URI when converting files (tools-java) #spdx Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Cancelling Build Profile Meeting (28th Nov) Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, November 15, 2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] FYI - planned downtime for tools.spdx.org Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FYI - planned downtime for tools.spdx.org Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FYI - planned downtime for tools.spdx.org Dick Brooks
  • Re: [spdx-tech] FYI - planned downtime for tools.spdx.org Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] FYI: CycloneDX now supports NIST Vulnerability Disclosure Reports (VDR) Dick Brooks
• [spdx-tech] tools-python architecture rework Nicolaus Weidner via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] FOSDEM 2023 - SBOM devroom info and CfP Alexios Zavras
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - Tuesday, November 8, 2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] Actor datatype David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Actor datatype Martin, Robert A
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Actor datatype David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Actor datatype William Bartholomew (CELA) via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Minutes update and agenda for Tuesday's Tech Call Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] General meeting update Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] General meeting update Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Event: SPDX tech team meeting - 11/01/2022 #cal-reminder Group Notification
• [spdx-tech] v3 punch list: Examples are needed to define Actor David Kemp
• [spdx-tech] Official spdx xml schema? Nicolaus Weidner via lists.spdx.org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Official spdx xml schema? Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Official spdx xml schema? David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Official spdx xml schema? Nicolaus Weidner via lists.spdx.org
• [spdx-tech] Supplier ambiguities, difficulties with the example given rtp via lists.spdx.org

• Earlier messages
• Later messages