Steve,

See NFPA 25/ 13.6.2.1(1)/2008 ed.

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Steve Leyton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seeing as the backflow isn't a fire appliance, it makes sense that it's
> outside the scope of 13.   I'm pretty sure the "full forward flow test"
> is a jurisdictional agency thing, i.e. NAVFAC or the serving water
> company.   So fire officials might require it too - for peace of mind
> perhaps?
>
> BTW, you mitigate the clapper issue by turning the FDC body upside down.
> Duh.
>
> Steve Leyton
> Protection Design & Consulting
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
> Sornsin
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:33 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: 200 psi test for components rated 175
>
> Don't most FDCs include clappers?  How do you backwards flow out an FDC
> with clappers? And what do you do when the system has a high demand
> volume - say over 500 gpm? You'll have a tough time flowing it out an
> FDC even without clappers.
>
> Seems it's the responsibility of the engineer of record (when they're
> present) to require the test outlet so the owner has a means of meeting
> the requirements of NFPA 25 - even if the inspectors never end up
> testing the backflow.
>
> When there is not an engineer of record, and a contractor is asked to
> design/install a system per code, I don't believe there is any language
> in NFPA 13 that would force a contractor to install the test outlet.
>
> Mark A. Sornsin, PE
> Fire Protection Engineer
> Ulteig Engineers, Inc.
> Fargo, ND
> 701.280.8591
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregg Key
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 200 psi test for components rated 175
>
> Yep, that could be the reason it is shown.
>
> Yea Matt, sorta trick question, We have installed a few wall hydrants at
> Military bases.
>        Funny thing is that they do there own inspections and they don't
> follow NFPA 25 that requires an annual forward flow on the backflows. So
> the only systems in our area that do have them , are not being used.
>        OK while we are at it, how many NFPA 25 inspectors perform the
> required forward flow test annually?
>
>
> -
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



-- 
Ron Greenman
at home....
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to