There are a great many government buildings out there well over 100 years
old and some may be seen at:
http://dc.about.com/od/communities/tp/WashingtonDCHistoricBuildings.htm

BTW, if sprinkler systems are not expected to near 100 years of service, why
does NFPA 25 (5.3.1.1.1.4) have inspection and testing criteria for
sprinklers in service for 75 years or longer?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 9:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: USACE Velocity

What I find laughable is that a Gov. employee, actually believes the 100 Yr.
BS!
Let's just say we use the best NFPA U/L FM materials only the very best for
this building! If it was an NFPA life expectancy we would be say "Maybe 50
yrs!" but because it's the GOV. the same materials and techniques are
supposed to result in 100 yr life? Must be some kind of Gov. Voodoo!

The GSA admits it has a very poor record of maintenance or inspection after
construction.
The GSA does not typically have control over water quality or distribution,
but expects its systems to be free of MIC. (More Voodoo!) The GSA says it
builds for 100 Year life, but simply by replacing its electric motors every
10-15 years, they would save money on the operating cost due to greater
efficiency, but do they? The only reason the GSA will replace an
incandescent light with a florescent on is because soon they won't be able
to get replacement bulbs. (Or maybe they create the special storage reserve
of incandescent bulbs kind of like Halon. (Illegal for everyone but the
Gov.) Or do they just keep patching and duct taping their systems together?
Does GSA spec all S.S. ductwork for every project? Does GSA establish a Duct
cleaning program for every building. Do they even change the filters to help
prevent things like legionnaires? Apparently only Anthrax or some other
letter carrying powder will allow the build air system to be cleaned.

It would be nice to have building that are 100 Year designed, if that was an
efficient use of tax payers' dollars, but to do it, and not follow known
efficiencies and savings in the name of Voodoo longevity is just more of
what wrong with "The System"

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to