Ken, I believe you are correct I think I may be getting too many standards 
confused...  Btw when are you heading to NC again?
 
Jamie
Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 28, 2010, at 8:18 PM, Ron Greenman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jamie,
> 
> Is the 18 at the flow switch a maximum to keep the paddle on the
> switch or a minimum to insure the switch operates? I would think the
> later.
> 
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Jamie.seidl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yes there are velocity requirements in the UFC along with the 3000 sqft 
>> HMRA.   While I don't have them in front of me, 20 or 24 fps comes to mind, 
>> and 18 fps at the flow-switch (per UL). This always brings me back to the 
>> point of when your calculating the HMRA, wouldn't you also need to calc the 
>> closest area?  No pressure loss = more flow?  I typically do this calc when 
>> sizing a tank/pump set up for sizing of the tank v.s. Duration...  Am I 
>> wrong?
>> 
>> Jamie
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Dec 28, 2010, at 7:25 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>> The technical parts of this discussion have been interesting.
>>> 
>>> I may have lost something in the trail of emails, but is there anything in
>>> UFC 3-600-01 or other UFC standards that require  velocity limitations.
>>> 
>>> I have to go to Afghanistan in a couple of weeks  to inspect some systems
>>> that were done by a South Korean company.  Prior to that we have to
>>> evaluate and do calcs. where pipe was schedule sized.  The fire protection
>>> work for the bases is supposed to conform to UFC 3-600-01, but no other
>>> govt. stds. that I know of.  Because these buildings are not likely to be
>>> long term, conservative design is not necessary and as many have pointed
>>> out, 0.10/3000 is twice the norm anyway.
>>> 
>>> I respectfully request no political commentary with the answer.
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> James L (Jim) Roberts, PE/SET | FLUOR | Principal Fire Protection Engineer
>>> – Central Engineering | [email protected] | IODC 20.5149 | O
>>> +1.864.281.5149 | www.fluor.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From:       [email protected]
>>> To:         [email protected]
>>> Date:       12/28/2010 05:49 PM
>>> Subject:    Re: USACE Velocity
>>> Sent by:    [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Vince,
>>> Believe it or not, there are considerable differences between UFC and GSA
>>> fire protection requirements.
>>> 
>>> I feel that it is better that we compete at the higher end of fire
>>> protection rather at the lower end.
>>> 
>>> There is difference in quality for longetivity.  Anyone who thinks that
>>> everything should be equal and minimal across the government only has to
>>> remember the volkswagen (peoples car) that was destined to be the same for
>>> everyone in another country.
>>> 
>>> Competition is good but it does not have to be at the low end of a business
>>> and specs do not have to be same from owner to owner or agency to agency.
>>> 
>>> Rahe
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>> 
>>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person
>>> or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>>> proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are
>>> hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination,
>>> distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon
>>> this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
>>> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>>> 
>>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>>> sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>> 
>>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>> 
>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ron Greenman
> Instructor
> Fire Protection Engineering Technology
> Bates Technical College
> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> Tacoma, WA 98405
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
> 
> 253.680.7346
> 253.576.9700 (cell)
> 
> Member:
> AFSA, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, NFSA, AFAA, ASEE, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC
> 
> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis
> Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to