On 3/21/17 2:06 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 20.03.2017 22:32, Dave Cridland wrote: >> Loosely, this is OK, but, in order: >> >> 1) Section 6 must go. … This issue is a blocker for me. > > I don't have much hope, but have to ask anyway: Would you consider a > dual approach where we keep section 6, get the XEP into experimental > while simultaneously work on creating a suitable SASL mech at the IETF?
Realistically, the work at the IETF will take quite awhile. A good first step would be reaching out to Matt Miller, who is one of the co-chairs and might in fact still be on this list. Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
