Post news and information from your neighborhood:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________
 
 
Mitch,

It's customary to check out a fact one believes to be
erroneous before publicly calling it such.

A simple google search of "Hubbard Bound to be Read"
yields a page on the 1500 AM website (a fellow Hubbard
broadcasting property) that plainly indicates Bound to
Be Read is indeed a Hubbard broadcasting property.

http://www.am1500.com/hubbard.htm , if you're curious.

As far as big-box Wal-Marts, etc being good
neighbors--we've been around that block already,
though we can go around again, if you'd care to. 
We'll see if Wal-Mart will be a good neighbor; it
would be a welcome break from their usual custom and
practice.  That's what the Hamline-Midway and UFCW
folks are organizing to find out.  Come to a meeting
sometime; they're at the Hamline-Midway buildling. 
Chris Conry at UFCW is the contact to find out the
next meeting date; I posted his address before, but
can send it to you again.

Agreed that it stinks that small, local businesses
have a tough go of it.  However, small local
businesses are a big part of what makes the economy in
this state go (and it makes living in St. Paul a whole
lot better, too).  Small businesses have a stake in
the community.  Small businesses don't pack up and
move to Mexico.  I still think it pays to help where
it's feasible, especially if the business is
successful in garnering support from neighbors, in not
only sales but shares, like Ruminator has been.  I
think it's pretty darned ironic that the pet store
example you champion was driven out of business by big
box retail---and in the same breath, you crow the
benefits of Wal-Mart to the community!  I can't speak
to the circumstances of those individual small
businesses you named, but Mitch, let me ask
you---would you have supported city funds for them,
either?  I doubt it.

(It's worth noting here, too, that the coalition of
folks working on this Wal-Mart deal actually expect
Wal-Mart to require a great deal more vendor truck
traffic than its predecessor, K-Mart, did---meaning
more congestion, more pollution, and more noise in
what's arguably already one of the more clogged
intersections of the city (Snelling/University).  In
your 'hood, no less.  I'll check on the exact stats
for you.)

Folks have made this point before, but it
remains---Ruminator has gone through a great deal many
more hoops for a much smaller chunk of dough.  Of
course, much of this is a dead issue because Ruminator
isn't applying for that chunk anyway, but I'm still
amazed that among all of the businesses this city
gives considerably more money away to, this is the one
that gets crucified.  

And, of course, Mitch, the "objectivity" issue works
both ways---having an axe to grind with CM Benanav
and/or Dave Unowsky hardly lends itself to a balanced
critique of CM Benanav's actions, or Dave Unowsky's
intentions in asking for city support.  As far as I
can tell, CM Benanav's support for Ruminator is an
accurate reflection of the community's support for the
business.

erin stojan
north end, ward 5

Oh, and PS--Suggestions of impropriety on the part of
elected officials are pretty serious allegations.  I
would hope that you would have some solid evidence to
them up.  We're all ears.

--- Mitch Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suggest A Link For This Page:
> http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/links.html
> _________________________________________
>  
>  
> At 12:17 PM 1/27/04, erin stojan wrote:
> 
> >Bob's point about Ruminator is well-taken.  The
> >Ruminator subject is getting almost as much
> attention
> >as the stadium proposal, which is ridiculous...
> 
> Nothing ridiculous about it; it's an example of
> sweetheart-dealing that the 
> average schmuck can actually affect.
> 
> So what is the standard by which we will judge these
> things (other than, of 
> course, my own fairly black and white standard)? 
> Pamela had a few good 
> points.
> 
> Erin had a few of her own:
> 
> >Ruminator has proven that it is a good neighbor to
> St.
> >Paul,
> 
> If that's supposed to be the standard, then you can
> hardly find better 
> candidates for government support than the people
> who ran the pet shop on 
> Snelling at Minnehaha for many years.  Wonderful
> neighbors - great with 
> tips on how to take care of your pets, without
> regard to your politics (are 
> you listening, David Unowsky?), virtually
> veterinarians in their own 
> right.  But they couldn't stay in business with a
> "Pets Food Warehouse" 
> down the street, so out of business they went.  Did
> the city queue up to 
> bail them out?  They had not spent the requisite
> time licking the jam from 
> between Jay Benanav's toes, so - sorry, charlie.
> 
> In fact, you can hardly find a shop that doesn't
> strive to be good 
> neighbors, from the local coffee shop (like Ginkgo,
> owned by relentless 
> DFLer Kathy Sundberg, who's benefitted greatly from
> Benanav's favor) to Dan 
> Perkins (WONDERFUL neighbor, former owner of St.
> Paul Firearms - who 
> unfortunately ran afoul the neighborhood PC Gestapo,
> AKA District 11), to 
> even the dreaded WalMart and Target, which pump a
> lot of discretionary 
> money into the community.  All of them strive to
> provide their communities 
> something they need, and to be good neighbors.
> 
> Being a good neighbor isn't even unique, much less a
> qualification for city 
> largesse.
> 
> >  the amount that it's asking for is petty
> >compared to those given to other businesses,
> 
> Depends on the kind of business you're running,
> doesn't it?  As I said in a 
> posting yesterday, $150,000 could help incubate a
> LOT of small businesses 
> in Saint Paul.  I know of one woman - an
> afro-American single mother, as it 
> happsn - who started a cleaning company.  Another I
> know runs a craft 
> wholesaling company out of a garage.  Want more
> examples?  I know 
> several.  Think any one of them couldn't have
> benefitted from a $5,000 
> loan?  Each of these businesses employs people -
> Saint Paul people, 
> nonetheless, not transient college kids - would
> benefit this city in the 
> long run much more than Unowsky's floundering
> bookstore.
> 
> >This is *exactly* the kind of
> >business that the city should be lending support
> to.
> 
> This is exactly wrong!  If the neighbors love the
> place so much, why is it 
> sucking pond water after 35 years in business?
> 
> If it's a neighborhood business, that's one thing -
> but Ruminator has 
> national pretensions.  Those pretensions have
> basically sunk the store.
> 
> >I think Erik asserted yesterday that the city's
> >financial support of Bound to be Read, just down
> the
> >street, served as a similar example to the
> Ruminator
> >situation.
> 
> Yes - a city subsidy that should never have been.
> 
> >  Actually, Bound to be Read is a Hubbard
> >Broadcasting property
> 
> Check your facts on that.  I think it's owned by a
> Hubbard, but not part of 
> HBI.
> 
> >In contrast, Ruminator
> >is truly an independent bookstore, not owned (or
> >beholden) to any of the corporate news media
> >conglomerates.
> 
> No.  It's even worse - it's beholden to a political
> party.
> 
> >We need more stores like Ruminator in
> >St. Paul.
> 
> And with Ruminator out of the way, we might be more.
>  More, healthier, 
> viable stores.
> 
> Sentiment has no place in this discussion.
> 
> Mitch Berg
> Da Midway!
> 
> Shot In The Dark
> The thing REALLY putting St. Paul on the map
> http://www.mitchberg.com/shotindark/ 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your
> password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
> 
> Archive Address:
>    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
> _____________________________________________
> For state and national discussions see:
> http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
> For external forums, see:
http://e-democracy.org/mninteract


=====
-----------------------------------------
There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick 
at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got 
to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the 
apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people 
who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be 
prevented from working at all!--- Mario Savio
------------------------------------------
Erin Stojan 
North End, Ward 5

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
_____________________________________________
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

Reply via email to