A G3 Upgrade will make a VERY large difference in usability in OSX. Do 
get more than 128 MB though, 336MB Seemed to be the happy spot for my 
S900, both when running one program and when running 20. This is 
especially true when multitasking! Technically, 128 MB ram will work 
fine, even if you use many programs, it is just that your HD will 
probably die from the equivalent of a heart attack from all the virtual 
memory work. Keep in mind that each window uses ram and not all windows 
are visible. Plus all the*Nix background processes will be using it as 
well.

Long story short, go....buy......ram. (If I remember right, the 600 used 
EDO/Fast-page right? if so check out www.macsales.com. In my experience, 
they usually have the lowest prices on old RAM. Anyone else know a 
place?)

-Robyn

On Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 03:57  PM, Nils Mueller-Scheessel wrote:
>
> I hope your wrong, but, alas, you do not know before you have tried
> it. For my part, I am semi-optimistic. My Apus 3000/c600 got a G3
> upgrade and it does not *feel* that much slower than the G4/466 we
> have at work. Initially, this computer only had 128 MB, and my
> impression was that you can work even with that if you do not open to
> much programmes at the same time.
>
> However, I might be wrong. Let's wait and see ...
>
> Nils


-- 
SuperMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 Service & Replacement Parts   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

SuperMacs list info:    <http://lowendmac.com/supermacs/list.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/supermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to