On 09/17/09 03:32, BeeNeR wrote: > On or about 9/16/2009 5:47 PM, Mark Hansen typed the following: >> On 09/16/09 12:45, JeffM wrote: >>> Mozilla-compliant browsers work very well rendering HTML. >>> Again: Rendering NON-HTML is NOT their job. >>> >> >> Good grief. Why, then, do you think Gecko-based browsers are >> in the market? Many, many web sites do not have good HTML. >> >> Perhaps the foundation should take the browsers off the market >> until all the site developers get their act together and start >> writing good HTML code? >> >> The fact is that if you want to be a browser in today's web, >> you need to be able to work in today's web. >> > > M$ is NOT God. Standards have been made. W3C uses those standards. > Many browsers use those standards. M$ and some web creators do not > follow those standards. Yes, they are not laws, but if all would abide > by the standards there would be no problem and all browsers would work > without problems. > > If all drivers followed all the laws, there would be fewer accidents. >
Those are all true statements. I agree with them 100%. What does that have to do with whether or not SM should ignore poorly-designed pages? _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
