>JeffM wrote: >>Mozilla-compliant browsers work very well rendering HTML. >>Again: Rendering NON-HTML is NOT their job. >> Mark Hansen wrote: >Good grief. >Why, then, do you think Gecko-based browsers are in the market? > Asked and answered.
>Many, many web sites do not have good HTML. > Specifically, those sites have code built for Internet Exploder. If you want to access a page *built* for Internet Exploder, just USE Internet Exploder. >Perhaps the foundation should take the browsers off the market >until all the site developers get their act together and start >writing good HTML code? > >The fact is that if you want to be a browser in today's web, >you need to be able to work in today's web. > aka "Bend over and take it". aka "Just surrender to The Borg". I choose to boycott garbage sites. If you can't find the content elsewhere, register your complaint --with those who have the power to change things. Coming here and complaining isn't going to change anything about their broken site. I assure you that the browser developers aren't interested in making the browser M$-compliant. That would be stupid. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
