>Don't use stunnel, use ssh, and forward the ports. Stunnel just creates
>an HTTPS connection, right?

>From Stunnel's man page
(http://www.stunnel.org/faq/stunnel.html#description):
The stunnel program is designed to work as SSL encryption wrapper between
remote clients and local (inetd-startable) or remote servers. The concept is
that having non-SSL aware daemons running on your system you can easily set
them up to communicate with clients over secure SSL channels.

Would ssh port forwarding be better method?

Markus

_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to