>Don't use stunnel, use ssh, and forward the ports. Stunnel just creates >an HTTPS connection, right?
>From Stunnel's man page (http://www.stunnel.org/faq/stunnel.html#description): The stunnel program is designed to work as SSL encryption wrapper between remote clients and local (inetd-startable) or remote servers. The concept is that having non-SSL aware daemons running on your system you can easily set them up to communicate with clients over secure SSL channels. Would ssh port forwarding be better method? Markus _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]