"Eko Priono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> My current position is that this list shouldn't dis-
> criminate OSen any more, whether that Windows, Linuxes,
> or anything else, as long as they run reliable on SurvPCs.
That's how I'd interpreted the intent originally. Glad to see it's still on
track!
> [...]
> Now this bring us to the issue of SurvPC "boundary", if
> you read my test page, you'll find out that I've moved
> up the "upper limit" into a grayer area, by stated "early
> Pentiums" -- which (IMO), will covers at least P-1's
> (including clones). Maybe I shouldn't define any limits
> at all in the first place? Something like "anything that
> no longer state-of-the-art" probably would be better...
It's probably better that someone post about something a bit off-topic and
NOT get flamed, than worry about 100% adherence to the 'rules'. Anything too
far off-topic, or at least uninteresting to some, tends to die off quickly
anyhow. I like where you're heading with it!
It's a nice list covering some uncommon topics. I've had to back off since
starting a new job, but it's still interesting to poke in once in a while.
- Bob
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
