I think we'll always have people able to provide dos resources and I dont'
think that by allowing newer boxes you'll suddenly get a flood of
technohalfwits running in here asking us how to plug in a mouse and
cluttering up the posting with idle chit chat. There's a flavour to this
list that seems strong, but to be sure, it's been stagnant for awhile.
Only answer is try it and see.
but I may be in the minority?
Well, I put out a test post on one of my two fuxored machines, the one
that's primarily hardware targeted. Heheh, don't even have an OS on it yet.
The other one I have a task to finish before I look for more advice.
At 02:17 PM 8/6/00 +0700, you wrote:
>Whether these are the right decisions or not I'm still in
>the dark. List members' feedbacks would be greatly needed
>here, including newcomers. My point is that even our list
>policy should be fluid, updated from time to time as needed,
>and should not be viewed as a sacred shrine, which obeyed
>blindly down to the letter... A real eye-opener, was when I
>found a local sysadmin group openly debated RFCs "trueness",
>from time to time...
bye,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(\
Yolanda ,,,,,,,,,,\\_/(\
UIN 4898262,,,..,,,Q Q \)
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,=(_T_)=
http://members.home.net/pippi5
{.. / .-.. --- ...- . / -... ..- -. -. .. . ... .-.-.- } A+
Remember: Amateurs built the ark, professionals built the Titanic.
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
