EP>My current position is that this list shouldn't dis-
EP>criminate OSen any more, whether that Windows, Linuxes,
EP>or anything else, as long as they run reliable on SurvPCs.
I'd like to add my voice to all the others in agreeing completely
with you, Eko.
EP>Now this bring us to the issue of SurvPC "boundary", if
EP>you read my test page, you'll find out that I've moved
EP>up the "upper limit" into a grayer area, by stated "early
EP>Pentiums" -- which (IMO), will covers at least P-1's
EP>(including clones). Maybe I shouldn't define any limits
EP>at all in the first place? Something like "anything that
EP>no longer state-of-the-art" probably would be better...
Again, 100% agreement.
It would be foolish (IMO) to try and specify particular processors,
speeds or video types. Todays State-of-the-Art will be sneered at
in 6 months time.
Maybe we should change the Listname to "cast-off computers". ;)
Mike
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
