Kieth: How nice of you to post (see below) the accurate remarks of mine. As you can see, it says "MANY" urchins on this site. It does not say "ALL" on this site are urchins. I have respect for those who strive to make this site productive and you tops the list. It is unfortunate that in your earnestness you have inadvertently included yourself in that list of "many urchins". You even took step to include others in the list! When I say urchins in this site, it does not mean all of those who come on this site are urchins. Sure those who concentrate on arguing on personal issues are urchins. Of course, personal attacks do appear frequently in this site. So, I openly said there are some urchins here. If we are matured people, we should not waste our time ( and others time) on personal attacks! We all are interested to see BD issues discussed and we are here to learn from those who know things (BD) better than us. Is it not a waste of time and efforts to attack one another on personal basis? I called such people urchins. I did not mean they are bad, but just urchins who do not know how they are wasting their (and others') time and energy. They are just like inexperienced kids! That is all to it! Now, I prefer not to fall into the same trap. Instead, let me go along learning more about BD from other ones who are NOT urchins in this site (the ones who are learned and experienced ones). Hope this makes those who are not urchins in this site happy. If anyone in this site feels that he or she falls into the category of learned ones, then, my observation does not apply to them, and so, they should not be concerned and hence, they would ignore useless things and get along with their productive work. On the other hand, if any one feels my observations and remarks directly apply to their activities, then, is it not time for them to look into themselves? I decide NOT to waste other peoples' time any more. ----- Original Message ----- From: Keith Addison To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Cc: Shukrainternationals Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:13 AM Subject: Re: [biofuel] EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel Trucks
chandra_the_good wrote, getting it all wrong as usual: >On the lighter side of the issue though: >Once, by mistake, I placed a statement (below) on this site (while >trying to send it to a friend of mine privately): It said, "you >know, Tom, this site is crowed with urchins, so, don't worry....". >Now, I feel was not wrong after all!! :). >Now, again, this on the lighter side of life please :) - It means 'smile'. First it wasn't this "site" (list), it was the Biofuels-biz list. Second, you've misquoted yourself - this is what you said: "Tom: I see a response from David Teal to your posting on the web. I suggest you just ignore it and continue with our project. As I said, these are many urchins on that web site and we should try to stay above them. -Chandra" This was in response to several posts that questioned an original post which that person (Tom) subsequently withdrew, with apologies. Your "urchins", which included me and others along with David Teal, have all contributed a great deal to the biofuels movement, whereas if you've contributed anything at all except snide comments that you then slide away from when challenged, and requests for other people to do your homework for you, it's remarkably invisible. At the time, all concerned refrained from stirring the issue up any further by challenging you over this as you deserved. They showed restraint - unlike you, here and now. Typical chandra_the_good, pretending to be promoting peace, sweetness and light and pouring oil on troubled waters, but in fact just insulting people, and the whole list, and trying to stir it up. You just don't realise how transparent you are, Chandra, but everyone else can see it. I know that because many of them tell me so off-list. So, no sliding away this time, explain yourself please. Response required, on-list, and make it snappy. Keith Addison Moderator > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tee > To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:58 PM > Subject: Re: [biofuel] EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel Trucks > > > Sad what this list has come too. Name calling and put downs the tools of > small minded people. > > The article is being reported by many sources and if you feel it needs to > be debunked. > Then by all means have at it. > Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
