commercemeister,

Thank you for this post -- you have capture the true issue:  Many
times, our pages are designed in a wysiwyg editor, and we need a
method of quickly converting their template into a renderable page.
This is not a trivial matter, by any means.  The push-back you will
get is for those who are not getting their templates from a wysiwyg
designer, and who haven't fought this issue.  I have faced it, and I
agree with this need.

I think you have laid out an excellent strategy, and appear to have
sold Flexy pretty well.  However, can you describe a bit more what the
changes would be to Symfony?

Also, when I last looked at PHPTal, it looked very nice.  Is LGPL
incompatible with Symfony?  I haven't reviewed the licensing terms
closely.
I also found POT:  http://pot.sourceforge.net/sf_demo/index.php?page=overview
Not too crazy about using the object tag, but maybe a good option.
Read the future 1.4 version supporting Javascript, AJAX and DOM...
And TinyButStrong:  http://www.tinybutstrong.com/description.php#raisons
They claim to support wysiwyg, but not via tags.  Interesting...

I think this is a need that should be pursued.  If you can help define
the templating system, I'll help collaborate on the project.

Mike

On Oct 17, 3:27 pm, commercemeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I proposed using Flexy on the users group a few weeks 
> ago:http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users/browse_frm/thread/409256...
> (is this the best way to link?)
>
> And gave specific reasons why my company needs a templating engine
> other than "php as a templating engine"
>
> The response was lukewarm, at best - and like here, ended up as a
> discussion of many different alternatives.
>
> Since genshi is Python, the proposal I see here is basically "coding
> from scratch" in PHP. I'm not sure that makes a whole lot of sense,
> unless it is modified to take advantage of PHP + Symfony.
>
> (See previous posts for my bias: I want my designers, when viewing the
> raw template in the browser, to see near exactly what they will get.)
>
> PHPTal is the closest of the PHP engines other than Flexy I have found
> that meet my objectives, from looking at the docs - though I haven't
> used it, and and may not for Symfony projects because of the license
> terms (LGPL) - I want to stay with licenses that works with the
> Symfony license.
>
> I can, however,  see quite a lot that could be done with a Flexy /
> PHPTal / Genshi "style" templating engine, that could be "native" to
> symphony.
>
> One consensus I hear is that there is a large group of people that
> don't see the need for any templating engine outside of PHP.
>
> Like vi, I think it is great to have and assume that Symfony will
> always support straight PHP as a standard, core engine. I nod to
> people with this philosophy, acknowledge the need and say "yes, we
> need to keep PHP as a templating engine ... it is extremely useful,
> needs to be there, and anything moving forward needs this."
>
> Another group needs / wants a something more, for various specific
> business reasons.
>
> What I don't want to see happen is for Symfony to fragment again: I'm
> already seeing Symfony/Propel being one "framework" that is at least
> partly incompatible with Symfony/Doctrine (Doctrine used by the
> "experts"?) - and requiring twice the development / support for many
> plugins.
>
> I don't want the same to happen on the templating side.
>
> (As an aside ... is there any way to have at least a basic ORM
> abstraction layer? ...)
>
> What I would like to see is a "meta" templating engine. Flexy
> understands <?php ?> tags. Hence, the Flexy plugin I have kinda
> working works with standard auto-generated CRUD, but you can drop down
> (move up?) to the alternate tokenized syntax pretty easily.
>
> To make this truly seamless, though, would require some changes to
> either Flexy or Symfony, so I'm not sure simple plugin-integration is
> the right way to go.
>
> If there is, indeed, going to be new development, my partial wishlist
> contains:
>
> - MIT-style license.
>
> - allow the engine to be part of the core, so I can be sure that I can
> use it in distributed plugins <- I realize this is completely out of
> my control, and a plugin that can co-exist with other engines is an OK
> option. Just don't make it an either / or choice!
>
> - understanding and allow <?php ?> and current template syntax: and
> allow me to turn it off in the controller or config.
>
> - truly "symfony aware". All templating engines I am aware of have
> their own ideas for i18N, l10N, etc. I want it to use Symfony's native
> functionality for this .. and any other features symfony has, like
> escaping: Flexy + Symfony could escape things twice.
> Helpers should be "native" and feel natural to use.
>
> - the generate crud tasks should be "aware" of the engine (plugin?)
>
> - compiling/caching of course is a must.
>
> - Syntax is critical. It is the reason to have an alternate template
> engine in the first place, and should be well thought out and
> designed. The goal is that I should be able to open up
> tempalte.tpl.html in Firefox and see pretty much what I'd get as if I
> rendered through the framework. To this end:
>
> - "tag based" - any of:
> -- <tr tal:repeat="myitem myarray"> ... </tr> [PHPTal]
> -- <tr flexy:foreach="a,k,v"> ... </tr> [Flexy]
> -- <tr py:for="link in reversed(links)"> ... </tr> [Genshi] (though
> the py:? namespace is a littler weird in php ...)
> Is ok
>
> NOT Smarty-style, which screws up rendering and breaks lots of stuff:
> <tr>{foreach item='nav' from=$navigation} ... {/foreach}</tr>
>
> - reasonable defaults for rendering in the editor:
> <flexy:include src="header.html">Header goes here</flexy:include>
> which will display "Header goes here" when you edit the template in a
> WYSIWG editor - and disappears when compiled..
>
> - url-rewriting: (From Flexy docs):
> "When compiling the template flexy can rewrite <img src, <script src,
> <a href and xul stylesheet urls. The format is "match/original:new/
> url, match/another/original:new/url" each combo is seperated by a
> comma, and the colon seperates the pair. This helps previewing
> templates without using the engine.
>
> - support for theming and sensical searching of paths within each
> theme. I've seen code-snippets and a plugin(?) that provides some of
> this, but haven't explored fully.  The engine should address this
> natively, not only for "look and feel" but taking into account the
> device type as well (mobile, etc). This needs to be seriously thought
> out.
>
> The list above is by no means exhaustive, it does cover most of the
> core features that I believe are necessary in an additional symfony-
> based templating engine.
>
> Benefit:  I have 1 project with about 20+ pages. I have the site in a /
> mockup/ folder for local editing, and symlinks to various templates/
> indexSuccess.html files. By carefully handling routing and image
> rewriting (compiled, so production performance is not an issue), one
> can browse the site in /mockup/ (statically) and /web/frontend_dev.php
> and get a site that "works" in both places - without broken images,
> with correct links to other files ... it just works.
>
> That type of rendering is what I'm after.
>
> I am willing / able to contribute resources to a sub-project that
> meets these goals, whether it is an integration plugin for an existing
> templating engine or new development.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick
>
> On Oct 16, 7:22 am, "Lucas Stephanou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hello dev's,
>
> > I'm here to start a thread about template system.
>
> > Today symfony doesn't use natively a template system to render presentation
> > layer.
> > IMHO, the genshi project[1], used in trac 0.11[2], is more efficient output
> > generator and I'm working with it in some plugins to internal use here in my
> > job.
> > All php options( OPT, Smarty, Haml port) that I knew isn't simple, clean,
> > and powerful, this in my opinion.
>
> > Well, What you think about? Is PHP a equivalent option? Start a similar
> > genshi project in PHP?
>
> > [1]:http://genshi.edgewall.org/
> > [2]:http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.11
>
> > --
> > Lucas Stephanou


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to