On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:31 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Hmm, I think the problem is rather the lack of BOOST_CPPFLAGS in the > flags used when compiling gdbusxx. > > Does this patch fix the problem? It also adds SYNCEVO_WFLAGS, which was > missing (unrelated, makes no difference unless there are problems in the > code). [...]
I've added that patch for testing against the 1.3.x branch and will include it in 1.3.2. However, some confirmation that it really helps would be useful before claiming to have fixed a problem in the commit message and NEWS file ;-) -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
