On 1/15/14 2:24 PM, martinq wrote: > because of the JOSM turn restriction plugin? What about changing that >> plugin? > > no, the argument for depreciation was: There is no need for this > artificial group: Grouping taxi (both "in service" as well as not in > service) with only those buses acting as public transport. Taxi access > and bus access are distinct things. No ambiguous, poorly understood > (here the poor plug-in just confirms that PSV is not well-understood) > short-cut like "psv" is needed. If taxi and bus can access, why not > bus=* & taxi=*? i think the best fix for the josm plugin is simply to add a checkbox for the emergency=yes access tag to the dialog.
richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
