On 16/07/2015, johnw <jo...@mac.com> wrote: > Ran into this issue today. They are constructing a new trunk road in an > area I’m mapping, an as is usual for Japan, they build the road in stages, > completing one stage before they go to the next. I know, down to about 20m, > the alignment of the sections to be built - so do I mark the whole road as > construction=, or do I leave the section which hasn’t had the ground broken > yet as “planned”? even though the road as a whole is under construction and > will be built?
The sections where construction hasn't started are definitely not "construction". And if we start distinguishing planned from proposed, they should certainly be "planned". For what it's worth, a highway=planned way inside a landuse=construction area makes sense too. Unless you plan to update the data regularly and/or depending on the timeframe, there's no big need to have a highway=construction step between highway=planned and highway=final_value. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
