Thank you, Matthew. As I said, "slavishly follow rules," no, not necessarily.
"Understand the issues," yes, through good dialog. I like what I see here, it
allows good consensus to emerge, tedious and perhaps even a bit annoying as it
may be. :-)
On Feb 19, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Matthew Darwin <matt...@mdarwin.ca> wrote:
> I respectively I contend that it is not all abbreviations in OSM needs to be
> expanded, not withstanding of the general direction to expand abbreviations
> in OSM. It is illogical to change the well used name of a location.
> There is even a wiki page which has been around since 2010 that lists some
> exceptions to what should be expanded in the UK:
Talk-ca mailing list