Thank you, Matthew. As I said, "slavishly follow rules," no, not necessarily. "Understand the issues," yes, through good dialog. I like what I see here, it allows good consensus to emerge, tedious and perhaps even a bit annoying as it may be. :-)
SteveA On Feb 19, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Matthew Darwin <[email protected]> wrote: > I respectively I contend that it is not all abbreviations in OSM needs to be > expanded, not withstanding of the general direction to expand abbreviations > in OSM. It is illogical to change the well used name of a location. > > There is even a wiki page which has been around since 2010 that lists some > exceptions to what should be expanded in the UK: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Invalid_Abbreviation_Expansion _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
