On 19 July 2010 06:27, Peteris Krisjanis <[email protected]> wrote: > I know you like to have personal flame war, but in nutshell ODBL is > share alike, so no problems here. I have two questions though: > 1) Why we need CT in first place > 2) What section 3 is about
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms 3. OSMF agrees to use or sub-license Your Contents as part of a database and only under the terms of one of the following licenses: ODbL 1.0 for the database and DbCL 1.0 for the individual contents of the database; CC-BY-SA 2.0; or another free and open license. Which other free and open license is chosen by a vote of the OSMF membership and approved by at least a 2/3 majority vote of active contributors. An "active contributor" is defined as: a natural person (whether using a single or multiple accounts) who has edited the Project in any 3 calendar months from the last 12 months (i.e. there is a demonstrated interest over time); and has maintained a valid email address in their registration profile and responds within 3 weeks. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
