On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:06 PM, andrzej zaborowski <[email protected]> wrote: [ snip ] > Maybe when you say ODbL you mean ODbL + CT, but I'll just point out > that John didn't seem to oppose ODbL, perhaps the opposite, just > opposing to the text of the CT. The CT is also what nearmap is not > accepting and what I would have trouble accepting.
I don't recall seeing the nice folks from NearMap posting on this thread. I do recall an assertion from another poster that NearMap is firm on the map data being Share-Alike, as is will be under ODbL. But no quotations attributed to NearMap, nor posts from them here. I think it does a disservice to NearMap to presume that anybody other than their staff speak for them. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
