On 19 July 2010 01:04, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:06 PM, andrzej zaborowski <[email protected]> wrote: > [ snip ] >> Maybe when you say ODbL you mean ODbL + CT, but I'll just point out >> that John didn't seem to oppose ODbL, perhaps the opposite, just >> opposing to the text of the CT. The CT is also what nearmap is not >> accepting and what I would have trouble accepting. > > I don't recall seeing the nice folks from NearMap posting on this > thread. I do recall an assertion from another poster that NearMap is > firm on the map data being Share-Alike, as is will be under ODbL. But > no quotations attributed to NearMap, nor posts from them here. I > think it does a disservice to NearMap to presume that anybody other > than their staff speak for them.
I meant it just in the same way somebody presented the position of Yahoo in this thread, and elsewhere we're saying "don't trace from Google maps as their terms don't allow that" even though possibly nobody from Google has said it in the given thread. Cheers _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
