On 19 July 2010 06:44, Peteris Krisjanis <[email protected]> wrote: > So, problem is, while ODBL is fine as SA license (for data that is), > CT requires to give OSMF rights to republish data under license which > so far by CT can be also non-share-alike, right?
The CT is also likely to conflict with cc-by data... > Will it be a problem to add small addition to this section 3 "or > another share alike free and open license"? Or it will destroy > someone's dream about publishing those data under BSD like or PD some > day? :) If people were being honest they wouldn't try to sneak things in like this... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
