-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi George,
On 31 December 2000 at 11:15:58 -0800 (which was 19:15 where I
live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points:
NA>> Yes, I understand the logic now, thanks to you and Marck. I just wish
GFS> TB!
NA>> wouldn't be so ambiguous in their use of language. I now have the
GFS> option
NA>> "Bind attachments..." checked, but I don't believe anyone could have
NA>> ventured a logical guess as to what those words actually meant, if
GFS> looked at
NA>> in a literal sense.
Just a quick note to point out that this "bad wrapping" is caused by
PGP. When used with TB, it is best to turn off PGP's line wrapping
completely since TB does its' own line break formatting before PGP
ever sees the message.
- --
Cheers,
.\\arck
________________________________________________________________
[ Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA ]
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[ PGP Key: http://www.silverstones.com/MarckPGP.asc ]
[ Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
________________________________________________________________
TB! v1.49 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOk+NkTnkJKuSnc2gEQL4egCfR9qqF65h6qmgxQpFTytKo3DLu0oAoLnq
NNZJ9YRSOyHjCv0iZu5PLrf6
=RBrk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
