I'm curious. If you had perfect LOS to your tower wouldn't a 5ghz
product be a cheaper choice or is that spectrum too noisy for you?
Ian Fraser wrote:
IMHO The point was - "look 186 customers at $50 per month on
ONE sector = 9.3 K in revenue per month from ONE sector on one
tower".... and one of the teaser emails had numbers something
similar to that.... some folks may have bought into that I
guess... blindly without doing the math ? Maybe, I suppose.
I wanted a 3.65 product that worked and had some decent power
behind it. Power seems to be there but these disconnecting UE's
are a Pain in the ass. Here's one of them. This is 8.3Km.
Perfect LOS; clear on F3 from end to end. It is the only UE on
this sector. Dead center of the beam, and it disconnects
randomly. Why?
Ian
On 04/08/2016 11:04 AM, Adam Moffett
wrote:
I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was showing -
they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being stupidly,
ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE regardless
of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my company... so
you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the Power
Point slides show... the math isn't there.
I remember those slides.....I kept my mouth shut while they did their
presentation, but I commented to my colleagues afterwards about the fact
that their graph showed the BS at 100% airtime utilization for 16 hours
a day. I don't remember what they were trying to demonstrate with those
charts though.
