I'm curious about this too. Are you achieving full modulation at 5+ miles with the integrated CPE?
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Jay Weekley <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm curious. If you had perfect LOS to your tower wouldn't a 5ghz product > be a cheaper choice or is that spectrum too noisy for you? > > > Ian Fraser wrote: > > > IMHO The point was - "look 186 customers at $50 per month on ONE sector = > 9.3 K in revenue per month from ONE sector on one tower".... and one of the > teaser emails had numbers something similar to that.... some folks may have > bought into that I guess... blindly without doing the math ? Maybe, I > suppose. > > I wanted a 3.65 product that worked and had some decent power behind it. > Power seems to be there but these disconnecting UE's are a Pain in the > ass. Here's one of them. This is 8.3Km. Perfect LOS; clear on F3 from end > to end. It is the only UE on this sector. Dead center of the beam, and it > disconnects randomly. Why? > Connection Time : *3* Hours *46* Minutes *25* Seconds > > LTE Information > State: *Attached* > > DL Frequency: *3655000* kHz UL Frequency: *3655000* kHz > Bandwidth: *10000* kHz RSRP0: *-95* dBm > RSRP1: *-94* dBm RSRQ: *-8* dB > CINR0: *23* dB CINR1: *26* dB > SINR0: *23* dB SINR1: *26* dB > TX Power: *1* dBm PCI: *373* > Cell ID: *95490* > > > > Ian > > > > On 04/08/2016 11:04 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was showing - > they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being stupidly, > ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE regardless > of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my company... so > you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the Power > Point slides show... the math isn't there. > > I remember those slides.....I kept my mouth shut while they did their > presentation, but I commented to my colleagues afterwards about the fact > that their graph showed the BS at 100% airtime utilization for 16 hours > a day. I don't remember what they were trying to demonstrate with those > charts though. > > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing > [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing > [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > >
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
