It still happened but I don't think it was as bad no.



On 04/08/2016 11:39 AM, Justin Davis wrote:
Did you have this same issue before you upgraded to the newest release?

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Ian Fraser <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    IMHO The point was - "look 186 customers at $50 per month on ONE
    sector = 9.3 K in revenue per month from ONE sector on one
    tower".... and one of the teaser emails had numbers something
    similar to that.... some folks may have bought into that I
    guess... blindly without doing the math ? Maybe, I suppose.

    I wanted a 3.65 product that worked and had some decent power
    behind it.  Power seems to be there but these disconnecting UE's
    are a Pain in the ass.  Here's one of them.  This is 8.3Km.
    Perfect LOS; clear on F3 from end to end.  It is the only UE on
    this sector.  Dead center of the beam, and it disconnects
    randomly.  Why?

    Connection Time :   _3_Hours_46_Minutes_25_Seconds

    LTE Information
    State:      _Attached_      
        
    DL Frequency:       _3655000_kHz    UL Frequency:   _3655000_kHz
    Bandwidth:  _10000_kHz      RSRP0:  _-95_dBm
    RSRP1:      _-94_dBm        RSRQ:   _-8_dB
    CINR0:      _23_dB  CINR1:  _26_dB
    SINR0:      _23_dB  SINR1:  _26_dB
    TX Power:   _1_dBm  PCI:    _373_
    Cell ID:    _95490_



    Ian




    On 04/08/2016 11:04 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
    I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was showing -
    they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being stupidly,
    ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE regardless
    of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my company... so
    you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the Power
    Point slides show... the math isn't there.
    I remember those slides.....I kept my mouth shut while they did their
    presentation, but I commented to my colleagues afterwards about the fact
    that their graph showed the BS at 100% airtime utilization for 16 hours
    a day.  I don't remember what they were trying to demonstrate with those
    charts though.


    _______________________________________________
    Telrad mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
    <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
    _______________________________________________ Telrad mailing
    list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
--
Sincerely,
Justin Davis
SkyWerx COO
970-731-9790

_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

Reply via email to