Births wrote:

> ... I am not sure than everyone creating adaptations and plugins even are 
> on github ... If the interesting stuff leaves this group, people will leave 
> the group but not necessarily to go on github.


Ste Wilson wrote:
>
> I don't get git hub...i keep trying... But.. Commits. Pr.. Fork.. Wtf... 
> And it all seems very formal.. Not sure April McEnzie of London, 
> Newfoundland would approve either! Which is to say I'm not sure threads 
> like tiddly smile would be created on git hub.


Ciao Steve & Birthe 

Right!

At base is ONE place. IF we could get here to work for finding HISTORY we'd 
be fine.

I suspect the solution is (a) mainly technical; (b) slight change in 
posting behaviour (maybe enforced tagging?) Dunno.

The last thing I'd think good would be yet more fragmentation on "relevance 
detection".

GitHub is good. But its NOT a discussion forum. Totally WRONG for that. Its 
primarily a code management system.

Best wishes
TT

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/24177888-e9a4-4ca2-ba1a-468002fc4698%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to