Ste Wilson wrote: > > We have been down and around this topic several times before and the > outcome is usually that yes Google groups is a bit* meh* but this is > where the community is,
(... My emphasis) Absolutely right. Freshbies may not be aware that this issue comes around, sometimes at large scale. Various solutions tried and largely don't address the "problem". I have come to think that the solution may be like a *Vatican Papal Ruling* in which some TW-pope pontificates with exactitude on past miscreant behaviour. I don't mean that negatively. I mean that it may occur after many iterations of pondering the real problem to tease out the MINIMAL change needed. we have a Reddit (which I think was Riz driving that) ... Still is. To decent effect. The points raised at the start of the discussion are that as well as the > threads of discussion we need to be able to, actively as a community, add > to a curated body of knowledge about tiddlywiki as solutions and code > snippets are presented because what we lose here is continuity. > *That is exactly it*. As is, I think we are actively discarding collective LEVERAGE to RANDOM fragmentation. That does not make sense. TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f9bb88de-b576-42a1-8dfb-00dd5fc5a843%40googlegroups.com.
