Ciao Peter Peter Buyze wrote:
The issue will keep coming up, from both sides of the isle, so to speak, > because of the absence of parameters. > Right. As in parameters, criterion etc. Note my OP is a negative. By which I mean, it points to a very specific lack here in ACCESSING RECENT HISTORY EASILY. And no apparent reliable way to do it except read everything (not practical). Mark S. pointed out that the OP specifics are difficult to address because the term "editing" is so widely used that matching posts about recent "innovations in editing tooling" would not work. I posted it because I thought it not only of interest to me but also a instance that exemplifies a common issue --- sifting what you need from everything you don't IF you are not able to read/scan everything daily. Is that a suggestible parameter / aim? By which I mean "TRACKING past posts must improve"?? My final contention is this difficulty finding things in GG damages uptake of potential directions for TW -- basically leverage is weakened and we all lose out. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/46cd2cf2-f8c1-4a07-aee5-d6764fe72ed4%40googlegroups.com.
