ludwa6: Thanks for you post. It resonated with me since its insights are consistent with me experience. I also appreciate the Rufus Pollack link
Regards, Hans On Saturday, January 30, 2021 at 5:29:12 AM UTC-5 ludwa6 wrote: > The UseCase that Cedric has shared falls squarely in the middle of a > problem space that TW is very well-suited to solve, i think, and much as i > resonate with the ideas shared by Finn and Charlie have shared, what i'm > really hungry for is a working example of some solution that solves a > UseCase as close as possible to that which the OP here describes. > > Reason i ask is: much as i love wiki for personal KM & productivity > management (have used different desktop wikis over many years, and finally > settled on TW5 as the best solution for me), every time i have tried to > deploy it as a workgroup solution, it has failed to achieve sufficient > traction to warrant its continued maintenance. > > My theory of cause about this could be thought of as the flipside of the > very coin that makes wiki such a powerful tool for quickly building an > extensive knowledge base, and a PERSONAL interface to same: it's fast, it's > "InterTWingly," it can (if built on such sound architecture as TW5) > accommodate whatever computer language you might be partial to, etc. > Problem is, when it comes to the languages that stand at higher levels up > the KM stack -i.e. for naming and tagging and classifying knowledge- we all > have different ideas. I guess that's what Rufus Pollock means, @charlie, > when he talks about the shift that we'll see > <https://blog.okfn.org/2007/04/30/what-do-we-mean-by-componentization-for-knowledge/> > > in the coming Componentization Revolution, when that 90:10 ratio of > Content:Interface will flip around to its mirror image. With granular > content everywhere, interface-building becomes the name of the game. > Question then becomes: how do we make of that interface-building game a > really good collaborative one? > > SO: seeing as how i'm no good at this, i'd like to know who really is. To > that end: can you please share here, any and all, links to collaborative > software documentation projects powered by TW5 that are open for us all to > explore? (read-only, i mean: the only case of wiki open to edits by all > that actually works in practice is Wikipedia -and that only by virtue of > its army of dedicated editors!) > > /walt > On Saturday, January 30, 2021 at 3:11:43 AM UTC Charlie Veniot wrote: > >> Bonjour Cedric et bienvenue à la TiddlyWikernité (fraternité >> TiddlyWiki? Pshiuuuuu ... boom.) >> >> I really can't see TiddlyWiki being anything but a great choice for just >> about anything. Even if you try it and decide it isn't right for the job, >> you still have "prototyping" value and likely have the benefit of having >> better figured out your needs/requirements. >> >> The beauty of TiddlyWiki, to me: it is like a blank canvas. Don't let >> yourself get stuck in the mud trying to figure out "structure." Avoid >> "structure block" (like writer's block), and just get to writing. Let >> structural needs sprout organically / incrementally / iteratively, and try >> to keep things easily adaptable with a "componentized" approach >> <https://blog.okfn.org/2007/04/30/what-do-we-mean-by-componentization-for-knowledge/> >> . >> >> It might take time to get everything juuuust right, but it will fit you >> and your crew perfectly. The option is a "canned" solution with >> prescriptive "whatever", and then you have to take time for you and your >> crew to adapt to the solution. (Yeah, I much prefer adapt a flexible >> solution to my quirky self.) >> >> Rock'n roll ! >> >> On Friday, January 29, 2021 at 5:41:09 AM UTC-4 work.ced...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everybody. >>> >>> I am Cedric, a French Software developer and I start working in a very >>> small (4 people) team o software developers in a very small company. >>> >>> Unfortunately the knowledge is neither organized either shared between >>> people who yet work in the same room and I want to start documenting >>> projects and applications while managing updates and versions. >>> >>> Knowing that we already have a Jira to manage our project but we cannot >>> afford for a team plan I was looking for a free open source wikimedia like >>> or a home made blog using Wagtail when I discovered Tiddly. >>> >>> Do you think that it can be an suitable tool for me? >>> >>> Best regards. >>> Cedric J. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/da6bc24d-6d48-4e17-a3e4-0e4b92d31f53n%40googlegroups.com.
