Instinctively, I'm thinking it should be possible to simultaneously have 
both "modes" (taking vs making) at the same time available, just because 
TiddlyWiki is so flexible.

If not simultaneous modes, then it should be possible to switch between the 
two modes without batting an eyelash, kind of like how my more recent 
TiddlyWiki instances can switch between "reader" and "author" modes 
(triggered by hide/show of sidebar).  Or how my Favourite Stuff and Projects 
<https://intertwingularityslicendice.neocities.org/CJ_ProductReviews.html> 
TiddlyWiki can switch between contexts.

That said, I must chew on it a bit, and read all previously mentioned 
articles a few times over.


On Friday, June 18, 2021 at 6:29:42 PM UTC-3 ludwa6 wrote:

> Thanks for engaging, Saq: responses inline below.
>
> On Friday, June 18, 2021 at 6:53:51 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Crude, but effective enough, albeit with some editing overhead in TW that 
>>> it would be nice to eliminate.  Am starting to explore the possibilities of 
>>> Logseq as a potential Dynalist replacement; it does outlining in much the 
>>> same way, but has some interesting export functions, including JSON and 
>>> Roam JSON.  If there were a way in TW to import such exports and convert 
>>> them into proper tiddlers... That would be amazing!
>>>
>>
>> It is definitely doable. How useful such an import is will depend on what 
>> kind of features/markup you are using in those systems and how well they 
>> would translate to wikitext. Converting pure text though is very straight 
>> forward.
>>
>
> It is mostly plain text, but for Markdown formatting ( which I could live 
> without) and links- formatted like [Google](https:// Google.com) -which 
> would need conversion to [[wikilinks form|https://google.com]].
>  
>
>>  
>>
>>> If anyone else has got some other solution for agile NoteTaking that 
>>> integrates nicely with TiddlyWiki for NoteMaking, i'd be very interested to 
>>> hear about it.
>>>
>>
>> To this end, it would be interesting to understand what features or 
>> workflow in Dynalist (or Logseq) make it better for note taking (vs 
>> TiddlyWiki) in your experience. 
>>
>
> Essentially it’s about speed and portability, traversing/ elaborating/ 
> reorganizing outlines as fast as fingers can type, and context switching 
> from local desktop to mobile phone in the field ( i.e. cloud) many times 
> per day without a hitch.  If this is possible in TW, I’d love to know how… 
> But i think it’s a case of architectures that are optimized for different 
> things, don’t you think?
>
> /walt 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bcd8e9f3-3a52-4a82-8a59-1bb56a65457dn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to