Charlie,

Yes, very similar, It is less about that working example which illustrates 
why we need not put much effort to obtain what is being discussed, but I do 
go on to discuss related issues and opportunities, such as creating 
bookmarks, did your reference solution include a share button for this? It 
should be quite easy. I also describe how to hide the field and 
discuss Further developments but yes it is the same use of the search on 
the URL.

I did not mention but it can be used instead of the permaview as well.

Regards
Tones



On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 13:38:20 UTC+10 [email protected] wrote:

> I've never used that link (to a specific post) feature.  That's a new 
> trick for me.  Thanks!
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/nEDB3zRBALY/m/z0BXBncwBAAJ
>
> Well, I didn't' spend any time making it pretty ...
>
> On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 12:29:08 AM UTC-3 TW Tones wrote:
>
>> Charlie,
>>
>> I am not sure. I can't find that specific reply in this thread. Can you 
>> give me a link from the actual reply please?
>>
>> I expect its something similar but with a different scope.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tones
>>
>> On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 13:12:58 UTC+10 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Silly question:  are you suggesting you are going to build what I 
>>> already built and mentioned a little earlier in this thread (Jul 20, 2021, 
>>> 10:09:07 AM) ?
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 10:17:10 PM UTC-3 TW Tones wrote:
>>>
>>>> Springer et al,
>>>>
>>>> Forgive me for repeating myself, although a lot of interesting ideas, I 
>>>> believe these to be *non-problems.* 
>>>>
>>>> A simple solution is available here. an Example would be an alternate 
>>>> button to simple permalinks, I think someone else used a share icon. When 
>>>> clicking this on a given tiddler, it would assign a next number to a field 
>>>> in the tiddler (basically issuing a unique value field - not a UID or 
>>>> serial or GUID) then use this field/number to uniquely identify the 
>>>> tiddler 
>>>> shared, so it does not matter if it's title is renamed. Then generate a 
>>>> url 
>>>> that instead searches for any (but only one) tiddler with that field value.
>>>>
>>>> If *anyone asks* I will build this share button soon.
>>>>
>>>> That is if someone wants to publish a robust permalink for a tiddler 
>>>> who's title may change they use a built for purpose alternative to 
>>>> permalinks. Perhaps the existing name permalinks is misleading, perhaps 
>>>> they should be impermalinks.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a working example
>>>> a tiddler with the "permalink" field=1
>>>> the url wiki-url.html#:[permalink[1]] 
>>>> In the wiki <a href="wiki-url.html#:[permalink[1]]">Open target</a> 
>>>> this can be dragged to bookmarks/favourites
>>>>
>>>> However I personally choose my tiddler names well enough when needed so 
>>>> they need not change in future, and if I am publishing a link somewhere it 
>>>> is to access specific content. the link has a purpose, and once someone 
>>>> has 
>>>> the link the purpose is fixed in time and should always honour its 
>>>> original 
>>>> share.
>>>>
>>>> A version of the above method where the link filter 
>>>> is [has[permalink]last[]] will always link to the largest permalink value, 
>>>> so one is sharing a link to the latest permalink tiddler or post.
>>>>
>>>> Another supportive trick is to hide the field from the editor with a 
>>>> tiddler of the form $:/config/EditTemplateFields/Visibility/fieldname 
>>>> eg $:/config/EditTemplateFields/Visibility/permalink with a value of hide
>>>> thus once set you have to go out of your way to alter the permalink 
>>>> value, that is its more permanent.
>>>>
>>>> Further developments (optional reading)
>>>>
>>>>    - Since the addition of the unused title operator, it is possible 
>>>>    (more to the point easier) to use this to generate a unique and 
>>>> incremented 
>>>>    tiddler title and serial number. 
>>>>    - Rather than shadow tiddlers I am using this not only to generate 
>>>>    a tiddler Serial Number (TSN) but a "ghost tiddler" that follows any 
>>>>    tiddler and provides a way to save metadata for any tiddler or field 
>>>> there 
>>>>    in (regardless of the title)
>>>>    - My only issues left are 
>>>>       - Finding a way to generate/assign such TSN and Ghost tiddler in 
>>>>       bulk.
>>>>       - rebuild a parallel solution - system serial number, to assign 
>>>>       a serial number to core and shadow tiddlers without touching them
>>>>    - Actually I have found you need only assign serial number where to 
>>>>    need them, say for these permalinks or compound tiddlers, that is with 
>>>>    subtiddlers that use the serial number for the parent rather than the 
>>>> title 
>>>>    or a tag.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Tones
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 06:50:01 UTC+10 springer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> About obsolete permalinks: 
>>>>>
>>>>> Surely a variant of the relink plugin could help maintain bread-crumbs 
>>>>> for obsolete links:
>>>>>
>>>>> Whenever relink does its thing, have it offer to create a 
>>>>> dictionary-tiddler entry pairing old-name and new-name; then have a 
>>>>> filter-condition ViewTemplate element show up at the bottom of old-name 
>>>>> tiddlers, where the new-name tiddler is transcluded (or linked-to) -- 
>>>>> perhaps pre-pending a note explaining that the old "Bombay" is now called 
>>>>> "Mumbai"...
>>>>>
>>>>> At first, I was worried about the case where I change tiddler title 
>>>>> from "Bombay" to "Mumbai" and then later generate a different one called 
>>>>> "Bombay" -- but there, too, I might be interested in seeing such a 
>>>>> ViewTemplate addition! After all, if I ever had shared a permalink to 
>>>>> #Bombay, some signposts around the changing namescape could be useful!
>>>>>
>>>>> -Springer
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 at 9:09:07 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is such an awesome thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 at 9:04:07 AM UTC-3 Soren Bjornstad wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Walt,* the thing that bugs me most about the “immutable title/ID” 
>>>>>>> idea is that unless your notes are also going to be immutable, the 
>>>>>>> *content* of a note can still change so much as to make the 
>>>>>>> reference not effective anymore. So I don't see much point in 
>>>>>>> bothering, as 
>>>>>>> long as you can avoid having links break. Presumably the thing you were 
>>>>>>> looking for won't move so far away from the updated note that you'll be 
>>>>>>> unable to find it, anyway (probably not more than one link away).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence why I have an awful lot of love for relink.  I would have a 
>>>>>> rough time without it.  No broken (internal links) with Relink.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a good point on external links breaking, though. It would be 
>>>>>>> cool if you could set up redirects within TW, so that you could at 
>>>>>>> least 
>>>>>>> have an incoming link to an old title go somewhere somewhat relevant. I 
>>>>>>> guess you could just leave the old title with a link to the new one, 
>>>>>>> but 
>>>>>>> without an obvious way to distinguish redirect tiddlers from other 
>>>>>>> tiddlers, they would probably get in your way and make you think they 
>>>>>>> were 
>>>>>>> the “real” tiddlers all the time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Link rot.  Redirects is a possibility.  I much prefer UID fields and 
>>>>>> providing links to a Tiddler in some TiddlyWiki with a "UID" reference.  
>>>>>> (related thread: A Prototype of UID's for stable permalinks 
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/l2Mwu3pOAXw/m/fuvWrwpDBwAJ>
>>>>>> )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if I want to provide folk with a link to a specific tiddler in 
>>>>>> some TiddlyWiki, in a way that allows me to change the tiddler title 
>>>>>> willy-nilly without breaking the link, I would give folk this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> https://tiddlywiki-programming.neocities.org/CJ_TiddlyWikiProgramming.html#:[uid[2]]
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://tiddlywiki-programming.neocities.org/CJ_TiddlyWikiProgramming.html#:[uid[2]]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For some reason, I prefer this than setting up redirects.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3e32e27e-5051-4ab4-970b-900b4729286cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to