Riz wrote: > > I am ending with this post. I feel I am taking up a crusade nobody is > bothered about. > > We can go to and fro for long time debating hypotheticals. An easy way for > refutation and clarification is actually setting up the documentation using > whatever platform you deem fit. >
I think many are bothered but it's a tricky one. There have been many ideas over the years (including ideas about mediawiki, probably even myself suggesting it) but it is a complex issue. I sincerely hope someone will prove my pessimism wrong. BTW, here is an idea <http://tiddlynodes.tiddlyspace.com/> I had some years ago, for documentation. The idea, if I recall, was to scrape the google group posts and convert them into tiddler chains that reflected the discussion threads here, initially. But then they'd be editable and taggable and because it is/was tiddlyspace people could include the wiki and refine stuff. Like the absolute majority of my ideas, it went nowhere. I didn't tell anyone about this particular idea except Eric, and I think I only recently may have referred to it somewhere. Some ideas from it still linger in my mind to be implemented in TWederation. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8abaf0e7-d67e-4f5e-9c1e-f5a73e45563a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
