That was a refreshing video, Josiah, thanks 😁 Yeah, I was wondering about modularity as well. With all the other amazing folks who are using BTC's widgets, separated widgets might be the best way to go. Although it might be trickier for the devs to keep all those modular plugins in sync with each other (this is just speculation, I've no experience with modular stuff)...
On Monday, April 9, 2018 at 7:25:44 PM UTC+9, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Dear Dynamic Duo, BTC (Batman) and JD (Robin) :-) > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK4H-LkrQjQ > > A small plea from Gotham City inhabitants. > > When you come to decide how the various pieces of this jigsaw are > finalised into plugins *I wish for modularity*. So that I could use parts > of your wholes without having to import stuff I won't use ... :-). > > For instance... > > -- the FAB buttons are so fab I think they could work alone--as well as > part of a bigger theme change. > > -- the TOUCHY stuff: pan, zoom, pinch, slide and crunch--some issues come > up cross platform. Ideally it would be good if they all work on touch and > non-touch screens. But I think, practically, some bits won't. I think > modularity can part help with this issue--so end users can be clearer what > will and won't. I very much appreciate that designing for desktop, tablet > and smart-phone simultaneously is a challenge that your Duo is playing with > in excellent ways. > > Just thoughts, best wishes > Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d4fd2a12-77fd-4e97-bf08-f1cc66447659%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
